Use-case classification
Separate assistive use cases from workflows that can materially affect customers, credit, KYC, servicing or financial decisions.
Control AI-enabled financial workflows with documented permissions, human decision points, vendor oversight, evidence and audit-ready records.
Each engagement can be scoped around the records, systems, parties and decisions actually involved. The objective is to make responsibilities, evidence, open items and next actions easier to see.
Separate assistive use cases from workflows that can materially affect customers, credit, KYC, servicing or financial decisions.
Capture model purpose, data sources, access rights, dependencies, change controls, testing evidence and accountability.
Design approval gates for decisions that the regulated organisation must retain, with clear escalation and evidence.
Map datasets, interfaces, credentials, tool access and information boundaries for AI systems.
Create evidence around third-party AI providers, subcontractors, access, audit rights, continuity and incident handling.
Maintain a structured evidence trail for material AI outputs, controls, approvals, changes and exceptions.
Six stages that give regulated teams a consistent way to assess, approve and evidence AI use.
Sort AI use cases by the decisions they influence and the customer or regulatory impact involved.
Review the vendor, model, data sources and dependencies behind each use case.
Set data, access and outsourcing controls proportionate to the risk of each use case.
Record who approved deployment, under what conditions and what human oversight applies.
Keep explainability notes, test results and decision logs ready for internal and external review.
Revisit use cases on a schedule and after any change in model, vendor or regulation.
Share the objective, parties, systems or transaction stage. FiveCheckMate can help define the information required, the workflow and the evidence to maintain.
Request an Enquiry →No. Governance workflows are designed to support the institution. The regulated entity retains its responsibilities and decision authority.
It can cover governance around data, models, permissions, human review, evidence and third-party controls. Actual credit decisions remain with the responsible institution and its authorised framework.
Yes. A pre-deployment control assessment can define permissions, data boundaries, approval gates and evidence requirements before production access is granted.
Customer-facing chatbots, credit or collections decisioning, fraud and KYC tooling, and any agent with access to customer data or payment actions are common starting points.
FiveCheckMate can structure the registers, approvals and evidence packs that such reporting draws on. The reporting itself remains the institution’s responsibility.